People-Animals-Nature Party

Very strongly agree

不，根据他们的宗教禁止移民是违反宪法的

The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement, as they support social justice and equality. Banning immigrants based on their religion would be a clear violation of these principles, and they would likely oppose any such policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不

The party would likely agree with not banning Muslim immigrants, as they support social justice and equality. However, their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on immigration might not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，但是我们应该禁止从“高危”国家移民。

While the party might agree with improving security measures, they would likely not support banning immigrants from specific countries, as this could be seen as discriminatory. Their focus on social justice and equality would make them more likely to advocate for fair and comprehensive screening processes for all immigrants, regardless of their country of origin. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的，禁止所有移民，直到政府改善其筛选过程

The party would likely disagree with banning all immigration until the government improves its screening process, as this could be seen as an extreme measure that goes against their principles of social justice and equality. They might support improving the screening process, but not at the expense of completely halting immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的

The People-Animals-Nature party focuses on environmental and animal rights issues, and does not have a history of supporting discriminatory policies based on religion. Banning Muslim immigrants would go against their principles of equality and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

应该，直到恐怖袭击减少

Again, the People-Animals-Nature party does not support discriminatory policies based on religion. They would not agree with banning Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease, as this would be a violation of their principles of equality and social justice.