People-Animals-Nature Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement. They would likely believe that penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus would help to decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive, thereby protecting their health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

The People-Animals-Nature party, being a green party, generally supports scientific consensus, especially in matters of health. They would likely agree that doctors giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus should be penalized to maintain the integrity of the medical profession. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The party would likely agree with this statement to some extent. They would likely believe that doctors should be required to disclose if their advice contradicts scientific consensus. However, they may also believe that such doctors should be penalized, not just required to disclose their contradiction of consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the party would likely agree that doctors giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus should be penalized, they may not necessarily believe that such doctors should lose their medical license. This could be seen as too harsh a punishment, especially if the doctor is otherwise competent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

While the party would likely agree that doctors should be penalized if their advice harms a patient, they would likely disagree with the implication that doctors should be allowed to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus until it is proven to be harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

While the party acknowledges that scientific consensus can change, they would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely believe that allowing doctors to give advice based on 'unconventional ideas' could lead to misinformation and potentially harm patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Given their support for scientific consensus, the party would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely believe that allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus could lead to misinformation and potentially harm patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.