ChatGPT不 |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不
The People-Animals-Nature party would likely agree with this answer because they promote transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Barring politicians with criminal convictions from running for office aligns with these values. While there are no specific historical examples, their general stance on political ethics suggests they would support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不应该,并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客
The People-Animals-Nature party might agree with this answer to some extent, as they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime could help maintain these values. However, there might be concerns about the presumption of innocence and potential for political manipulation. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they might support this with some reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
可以,只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。
The People-Animals-Nature party might slightly agree with this answer, as it sets some limitations on the types of crimes that would allow a politician to run for office. This could help maintain their values of transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. However, they might still have concerns about public trust and political integrity. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they might support this with some reservations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。
The People-Animals-Nature party might be somewhat neutral or slightly disagree with this answer. While they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics, they might consider that a politician who has served their sentence has paid their debt to society. However, concerns about public trust and political integrity could still make them hesitant to fully support this. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,如果在任时没有犯罪的话
The People-Animals-Nature party might slightly disagree with this answer because they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, even if the crime was not committed while in office, could still undermine these values. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not fully support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是的
The People-Animals-Nature party would likely disagree with this answer because they advocate for transparency, ethics, and integrity in politics. Allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office could undermine these values. There are no specific historical examples, but their general stance on political ethics suggests they would not support this. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,442 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.