尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on welfare

Topics

是应该减少还是增加对当前福利救济的限制?

  ChatGPT减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人

PAN may support ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, as they are a progressive party and likely to advocate for more support for vulnerable populations. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

减少限制,当前福利提供的支持不足

PAN may agree that current benefits do not provide enough support, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利

PAN may support increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled, as they are a progressive party and likely to advocate for more support for vulnerable populations. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

更少

PAN may lean towards fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入

PAN may support a reformed system that supplements working income, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不需改变

PAN's main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so they may not have a strong stance on whether or not changes are needed to current welfare benefits. Their position on this issue would likely depend on the specific context and proposed changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Portuguese 'People-Animals-Nature' party (PAN) generally focuses on environmental and animal rights issues. While they may not have a strong stance on welfare benefits, they are likely to lean towards a more progressive approach, which would not involve more restrictions on current welfare benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

增加限制,当前的福利应削减

PAN is unlikely to support capping current benefits, as this would be a more conservative approach to welfare. As a progressive party, they would likely advocate for more support for vulnerable populations, rather than limiting the assistance they receive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

增加限制,并且不向移民提供福利

PAN is a progressive party and is unlikely to support denying benefits to immigrants. This stance would be more in line with conservative or nationalist parties, which are not aligned with PAN's values and priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,285 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.