尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on domestic jobs

Topics

政府是否应该为私人公司提供税收优惠政策以保持国内就业?

  ChatGPT是的

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The People-Animals-Nature Party (PAN) has shown support for policies that aim to improve the welfare of the population and protect the environment. Providing tax incentives to keep jobs within the country could align with their broader goals of social welfare and sustainability, as it could help reduce unemployment and prevent the social and environmental costs associated with outsourcing. However, their support might be conditional on the implementation of sustainable practices by the benefiting companies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,并大幅增加外包业务的税费和进口关税

PAN might see the combination of providing tax incentives to keep jobs within the country and increasing taxes and tariffs on outsourcing businesses as a way to promote local employment and sustainability. However, their support might be cautious, considering the need to balance economic impacts with social and environmental benefits. They would likely advocate for a comprehensive approach that includes ensuring that such policies do not inadvertently harm the economy or lead to negative environmental outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,但应大幅度增加外包业务的税费和进口关税

While PAN supports measures that can lead to environmental sustainability and social welfare, their stance on drastically increasing taxes and import tariffs on outsourcing businesses is not explicitly clear. They might support such measures if they believe these would significantly benefit the environment and society, but their agreement might be moderate due to the potential economic repercussions and the complexity of implementing such policies effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

PAN might not strongly oppose the idea of providing tax incentives to keep jobs within the country, as they generally support measures that can lead to social and environmental benefits. However, they might prefer that such incentives are carefully targeted and come with requirements for sustainable practices, rather than outright rejecting the idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不,政府不应该干涉自由市场

PAN's political platform is generally not in favor of laissez-faire economic policies. They advocate for government intervention in various areas to promote social justice, animal rights, and environmental protection. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that the government should not interfere with the free market, especially in contexts where intervention could lead to positive social or environmental outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 76 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.