尝试政治测验

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on government surveillance

Topics

政府是否应该监控电话和电子邮件?

  ChatGPT不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,而且应立法防止政府监视公民的通信

This answer aligns with the party's stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Given their stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights, the People-Animals-Nature party would likely agree with the statement that the government should not be able to monitor phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是只有从法院的命令

The party may agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a level of oversight and legal process before surveillance can occur. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and infringements on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是只针对那些有犯罪背景的人

While the party may agree with the idea of monitoring those with criminal backgrounds, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and infringements on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,打击恐怖主义是必要的

While the party may understand the need for security measures, they would likely be against the idea of using terrorism as a justification for broad surveillance measures that infringe on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的

The People-Animals-Nature party in Portugal is a progressive party that values individual freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely be against broad government surveillance of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

People-Animals-Nature 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 108 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.