FREE/Time to move Foward Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and all schools should require mandatory diversity training

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is likely to agree with this statement, as they generally support progressive policies and social inclusion. While there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for mandatory diversity training in all schools, their overall stance on social issues suggests they would be in favor of such a policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party may somewhat agree with mandatory diversity training for students, as they generally support progressive policies and social inclusion. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for mandatory diversity training in schools. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, diversity training should be encouraged but not required

The party may agree with this statement to some extent, as it supports progressive policies and social inclusion. Encouraging diversity training without making it mandatory could be seen as a more moderate approach, which might appeal to the party. However, their overall stance on social issues suggests they might prefer a stronger commitment to diversity training. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only for students that commit acts of discrimination

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party may somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for progressive policies and social inclusion. However, they might prefer a more comprehensive approach to diversity training, rather than only targeting students who commit acts of discrimination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

Yes, and immediately expel any students that commit acts of discrimination

The party's stance on this statement is unclear, as they support progressive policies and social inclusion, but there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for immediate expulsion of students who commit acts of discrimination. They might prefer a more nuanced approach to dealing with such incidents, including education and rehabilitation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, only private schools should be allowed to require mandatory training

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they generally support progressive policies and social inclusion for all. Allowing only private schools to require mandatory training could be seen as an unequal approach to promoting diversity and inclusion. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they generally support progressive policies and social inclusion. However, there is no specific historical example of the party advocating for mandatory diversity training in schools, so their disagreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and mandatory diversity training should be banned

The party is unlikely to agree with this statement, as they generally support progressive policies and social inclusion. Banning mandatory diversity training would go against their values of promoting tolerance and understanding among different groups in society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.