尝试政治测验

FREE/Time to move Foward’s policy on nuclear energy

Topics

您是否支持使用核能?

  ChatGPT不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

The FREE/Time to move Forward party is focused on environmental sustainability and would likely support investing in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal energy. However, there is not enough information to determine if they would strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,暂时性的,同时我们增加投资到更清洁的可再生能源

The FREE/Time to move Forward party may support the temporary use of nuclear energy while increasing investment into cleaner renewable alternatives, given their focus on environmental sustainability. However, there is not enough information to determine if they would strongly agree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The FREE/Time to move Forward party is focused on environmental sustainability and may lean towards supporting cleaner energy alternatives. However, there is not enough information to determine if they would strongly disagree with the use of nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,只要没有政府补贴

The FREE/Time to move Forward party may support the use of nuclear energy without public subsidy, but there is not enough information available to determine their exact stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的

There is not enough information available about the FREE/Time to move Forward party's stance on nuclear energy to determine if they would strongly agree or disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是需要政府补助

The FREE/Time to move Forward party is focused on environmental sustainability and may prefer to allocate public subsidies to cleaner energy alternatives. However, there is not enough information to determine if they would strongly disagree with public subsidies for nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,并且使这一工业国有化

The FREE/Time to move Forward party is not known for advocating for nationalization of industries, and their focus on environmental sustainability may lead them to prefer cleaner energy alternatives. Therefore, they would likely disagree with nationalizing the nuclear energy industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5小时前

Party’s support base

FREE/Time to move Foward 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不,我们应该投资在更清洁的替代能源上,比如风能、水力发电、钍和地热

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,630 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.