尝试政治测验

FREE/Time to move Foward’s policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

  ChatGPTYes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The FREE/Time to Move Forward Party, with its emphasis on sustainability, human rights, and ethical governance, would likely strongly support a more stringent approach to arms sales, including banning all sales to countries with human rights violations. This stance would be in line with a proactive approach to preventing human rights abuses and promoting global peace and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The FREE/Time to Move Forward Party, being a progressive and environmentally focused party in Portugal, likely supports measures that promote human rights and ethical international relations. Restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations align with a general progressive stance on foreign policy and human rights. However, the party's specific platform details on arms sales are not widely documented, so the score reflects a general alignment with progressive values rather than a documented stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the FREE/Time to Move Forward Party is likely to support measures that promote peace and human rights, a complete ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might not be fully aligned with their policies, as they might recognize the complexity of international relations and the potential need for strategic partnerships. This score reflects a cautious support for the idea, tempered by practical considerations of foreign policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The FREE/Time to Move Forward Party, given its progressive and human rights-oriented platform, would likely disagree with the notion of prioritizing the defense needs of allies over the human rights violations of potential arms recipients. This stance would conflict with a fundamental commitment to human rights and ethical international relations, suggesting a strong disagreement with this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Given the FREE/Time to Move Forward Party's progressive stance, it is highly unlikely they would support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Such a position would contradict the general principles of human rights advocacy and ethical governance that align with the values of progressive parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.