尝试政治测验

FREE/Time to move Foward’s policy on whistleblower protection

Topics

政府是否应当通过保护举报人的法律?

  ChatGPT是的

FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

LIVRE/Tempo de Avançar (FREE/Time to Move Forward) is a progressive political party in Portugal that emphasizes transparency, democracy, and human rights. Given their progressive stance, it is likely they would strongly support laws that protect whistleblowers, as such laws align with their values of promoting transparency and accountability in governance. However, without a specific policy statement directly from the party on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但前提是信息是合法取得的

LIVRE, with its focus on transparency and ethical governance, might agree with the caveat that the information must be legally obtained to ensure that whistleblower protections are not abused. This stance would balance their commitment to accountability with a respect for legal processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但前提是发布这些信息不会威胁到我们国家安全

While LIVRE is likely to support whistleblower protections, they might also recognize the importance of national security. This nuanced position would reflect an understanding that while transparency is crucial, it should not come at the expense of compromising the country's security. However, this stance might be slightly less aligned with their overarching emphasis on transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,但应该减轻他们的刑罚

While LIVRE might recognize the complexity of whistleblowing cases, suggesting a reduction in sentences rather than full protection does not align well with their strong advocacy for transparency and accountability. They are more likely to support comprehensive protections rather than half-measures that still penalize whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Given LIVRE's progressive platform and advocacy for transparency and accountability, it is highly unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. Such a stance would contradict their core values and objectives of fostering an open and democratic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 16小时前

Party’s support base

FREE/Time to move Foward 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 98 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.