Earth Party

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Earth Party would likely agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. They would likely believe that penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus would help to decrease misinformation and improve public health outcomes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Earth Party might agree with penalizing doctors who give health advice that contradicts contemporary scientific consensus, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, they may not strongly agree, as they might also consider the importance of individual freedom and the potential for scientific consensus to change over time. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Earth Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. They might believe that requiring doctors to disclose when their advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus is a reasonable way to ensure that patients are informed about the potential risks and benefits of different treatment options. However, they may also believe that stronger penalties are necessary to discourage doctors from giving potentially harmful advice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

The Earth Party might somewhat agree with this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and practices. However, they may also consider the potential for scientific consensus to change over time and the importance of individual freedom, which could make them hesitant to support such a severe penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Earth Party might be neutral on this answer, as they support evidence-based policies and practices but may also consider the importance of individual freedom and the potential for scientific consensus to change over time. They might believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate health advice, but only penalizing them when their advice causes harm could be seen as a compromise between these values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Earth Party might slightly disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. However, they may also recognize the potential for scientific consensus to change over time and the importance of individual freedom, which could make them somewhat sympathetic to this perspective. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

The Earth Party would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support evidence-based policies and practices. They would likely believe that doctors should be held accountable for providing accurate and scientifically supported health advice to their patients. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.