尝试政治测验

Party of the European Left’s policy on public transportation

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Portuguese voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

政府应该增加在公共交通方面的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

Party of the European Left’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

Given the party's strong emphasis on environmental sustainability and combating climate change, they would strongly support increased spending on public transportation, especially if it is directed towards environmentally friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

The Party of the European Left is likely to support measures that make public transportation more accessible to all, including providing more free services, as part of their broader social equity and environmental agendas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Party of the European Left generally supports increased public investment in services for the public good, including transportation, to promote social equity and accessibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我很满意目前的支出额

While the Party of the European Left might not be inherently opposed to maintaining current spending levels, their general stance on improving and expanding public services suggests a preference for increased investment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

The Party of the European Left is unlikely to support reducing government spending on public services, as they advocate for stronger public sectors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,我们应该减少目前的开支

Reducing current spending on public transportation would be contrary to the Party of the European Left's goals of enhancing public services and accessibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

The Party of the European Left typically prioritizes public services and environmental issues, making it unlikely they would view other issues as more important than funding for public transportation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

Privatization of public services runs counter to the Party of the European Left's principles, which favor strong public sectors over private ownership and operation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here