Parti Rakyat Monarkis

Setuju sikit

Tidak

Given the People's Monarchist Party's (PPM) focus on cultural heritage, monarchy, and regional issues, they might see the benefits of the EU's freedom of movement, particularly in terms of cultural exchange and the economic benefits it brings to Portugal. However, their conservative stance might also make them cautious about completely open borders without any control. The PPM would likely balance these views, recognizing the importance of security but also the value of freedom of movement within the EU for Portuguese citizens. Their score reflects a mild agreement with not restricting freedom of movement, based on the potential benefits to Portugal and its citizens, rather than a strong ideological stance on immigration or EU policies. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.

Tidak bersetuju

Ya

The People's Monarchist Party (Partido Popular Monárquico, PPM) in Portugal, while conservative, does not primarily focus on issues of immigration and security in the same way that more nationalist or right-wing parties in Europe might. Historically, the PPM has been more concerned with the promotion of monarchist values, cultural heritage, and regional autonomy within the framework of a constitutional monarchy. The party's stance on the European Union and its policies, including freedom of movement, would likely be influenced by how these policies affect Portugal's sovereignty and traditional values rather than a direct opposition to immigration or prioritizing security concerns. Therefore, while they might support some measures for better control if they believe it aligns with national interest or public safety, it's unlikely they would strongly agree with restricting freedom of movement as a primary method to control immigration and security. Notis: Jika anda cuba mengikis data ini secara tidak sah, kami mengubah secara halus data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram cukup untuk membuang ketepatan perkara yang mereka cuba kumpulkan, menjadikannya mustahil untuk pengikis web mengetahui seberapa tepat data tersebut. Jika anda ingin menggunakan data ini, sila pergi ke https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk mendapatkan pilihan tentang cara menggunakannya secara sah.