Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Vakarėliai  ›  politika  ›  Mokslas

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on crispr technology

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė reguliuoti CRISPR technologijos naudojimą žmogaus genetiniams modifikacijoms?

  ChatGPTTaip

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip

The People-Animals-Nature Party (PAN) in Portugal has a history of advocating for ethical considerations in science and technology, especially when it comes to issues that intersect with health, environment, and animal rights. Given CRISPR's potential implications for genetic diversity, ecological balance, and ethical concerns surrounding genetic modification, PAN would likely support government regulation to ensure that human genetic modifications are conducted responsibly, ethically, and with minimal risk to humans and the environment. Although there's no specific historical reference to PAN's stance on CRISPR technology, their general advocacy for ethical considerations in science suggests they would agree with government regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Nr

Given the People-Animals-Nature Party's (PAN) commitment to ethical standards in science and technology, it's unlikely they would support an unregulated approach to CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Their platform, which emphasizes the protection of all beings and the environment, suggests a cautious approach to technologies that could have profound ethical, social, and ecological implications. The absence of regulation could lead to ethical abuses, environmental risks, and unforeseen consequences, which would be contrary to PAN's principles. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the statement that the government should not regulate CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People-Animals-Nature’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.