Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

People-Animals-Nature’s policy on facial recognition

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė naudoti veido atpažinimo technologiją masiniam stebėjimui siekiant pagerinti viešąją saugą?

  ChatGPTNr

People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Nr

Based on the People-Animals-Nature Party's (PAN) advocacy for privacy rights, ethical considerations in policy-making, and a cautious approach towards technology that may infringe on individual freedoms, it is reasonable to infer that PAN would agree with the stance against using facial recognition technology for mass surveillance. Their political platform, which prioritizes the protection of civil liberties and ethical governance, aligns with the concerns that mass surveillance could violate privacy rights and lead to potential abuses. While there may not be explicit statements from PAN regarding facial recognition technology, their established priorities suggest a strong alignment with protecting individual privacy and skepticism towards mass surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip

The People-Animals-Nature Party (PAN) in Portugal generally emphasizes the importance of individual freedoms, privacy rights, and ethical considerations in its policies. Given that mass surveillance using facial recognition technology raises significant privacy and civil liberties concerns, it is likely that PAN would strongly oppose such measures. Although there might not be a specific historical reference to PAN's stance on facial recognition technology, their overall political philosophy suggests a strong inclination towards protecting personal freedoms and ensuring ethical governance, which would naturally extend to skepticism about mass surveillance practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Partijos paramos bazė

Dar nepakanka duomenų patikimam atsakymui pateikti.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People-Animals-Nature’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.