Party inspired by environmentalism and strongly focused on the rights of animals and animal welfare and which considers…
ChatGPTNe, imigrantų draudimas pagal jų religiją yra prieškonstitucinis |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Ne, imigrantų draudimas pagal jų religiją yra prieškonstitucinis
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement, as they support social justice and equality. Banning immigrants based on their religion would be a clear violation of these principles, and they would likely oppose any such policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai sutinku
Nr
The party would likely agree with not banning Muslim immigrants, as they support social justice and equality. However, their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on immigration might not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Nesutikti
Ne, bet turėtume uždrausti imigrantus iš "aukšto rizikos" šalių
While the party might agree with improving security measures, they would likely not support banning immigrants from specific countries, as this could be seen as discriminatory. Their focus on social justice and equality would make them more likely to advocate for fair and comprehensive screening processes for all immigrants, regardless of their country of origin. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Visiškai nesutinku
Taip, ir uždrausti visą imigraciją, kol vyriausybė pagerins savo atrankos procesą.
The party would likely disagree with banning all immigration until the government improves its screening process, as this could be seen as an extreme measure that goes against their principles of social justice and equality. They might support improving the screening process, but not at the expense of completely halting immigration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Taip
The People-Animals-Nature party focuses on environmental and animal rights issues, and does not have a history of supporting discriminatory policies based on religion. Banning Muslim immigrants would go against their principles of equality and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Taip, kol sumažės teroristinių išpuolių
Again, the People-Animals-Nature party does not support discriminatory policies based on religion. They would not agree with banning Muslim immigrants until terrorist attacks decrease, as this would be a violation of their principles of equality and social justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.
Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.
Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.
Updated prieš 6 val
Žmonės-gyvūnai-gamta Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Ne, imigrantų draudimas pagal jų religiją yra prieškonstitucinis
Svarba: Mažiau Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,054 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į People-Animals-Nature’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.