Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

FREE/Time to move Foward’s policy on video surveillance

Temos

Ar turėtų vyriausybė padidinti vaizdo stebėjimą viešose vietose?

  ChatGPTNe, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Ne, ir vyriausybė peržengė ribas kišdamasi į piliečių privatumą.

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as they value individual freedoms and privacy. They would likely argue that the government should focus on other methods of addressing public safety concerns without infringing on citizens' privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely support this answer, as it balances the need for public safety with the protection of individual freedoms and privacy. By focusing on high crime areas, the party can show that they are addressing public safety concerns while still respecting citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Nr

The party would likely lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places, as they value individual freedoms and privacy. However, they may not be completely against it in specific situations where it could help improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, daugiau policijos turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis.

The party may support this answer to some extent, as it focuses on addressing public safety concerns without increasing video surveillance. However, they may also be concerned about the potential for increased police presence to infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir daugiau policininkų turėtų būti pridėta į aukšto nusikalstamumo sritis

The party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it addresses public safety concerns by increasing both video surveillance and police presence in high crime areas. However, they may still be concerned about the potential for these measures to infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Taip

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is a liberal party that values individual freedoms and privacy. While they may not be completely against video surveillance, they would likely not support a blanket increase in surveillance in all public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 6 val

Partijos paramos bazė

FREE/Time to move Foward Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, bet tik tose vietose, kur nusikalstamumas yra didelis

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,314 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į FREE/Time to move Foward’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.