We, the Citizens! (Nós, Cidadãos! in Portuguese) is a political party in Portugal that emerged as a response to widespread dissatisfaction with the traditional political establishment and the desire for greater citizen involvement in the political… Read more
ChatGPTYes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive |
We, the Citizens!’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
The party would likely strongly agree with this statement, as they generally support measures that increase the quality of information available to citizens and decrease misinformation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The 'We, the Citizens!' party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support the idea of accountability in all professions, including medicine. However, they may not fully agree without additional context or conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
The party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support measures that increase transparency and allow citizens to make informed decisions. However, they may argue that this is not enough and that doctors should also face penalties for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
The party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support the idea of accountability. However, they may argue that doctors should be held to a high standard of care regardless of whether their advice has been proven to harm a patient. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
While the party supports accountability, they may not fully agree with such a severe penalty without considering the specific circumstances. They would likely argue for a more nuanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
While the party may agree that scientific consensus can change, they would likely argue that doctors should still be held to the current standards of care and should not be allowed to give advice that contradicts current scientific consensus without consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given their stance on accountability, the party would likely disagree with this statement. They would likely argue that doctors should be held to a high standard of care and should not be allowed to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without consequences. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to We, the Citizens!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
