Together for the People Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

The Together for the People Party might strongly agree with the idea of banning all sales to countries with human rights violations, as this aligns with a principled stand on human rights and ethical foreign policy. However, without explicit statements or policies from the party on this specific issue, the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Together for the People Party, being a smaller and less internationally focused party, might generally agree with the idea of restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, aligning with a broader concern for human rights. However, without a specific foreign policy platform or historical actions directly related to this issue, the score reflects a moderate agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While the Together for the People Party may support measures that promote human rights, a complete ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might be seen as too extreme or impractical. The score reflects a cautious agreement, assuming the party would weigh the implications of such a policy on international relations and national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Together for the People Party, likely prioritizing human rights and ethical considerations in foreign policy, would probably disagree with the idea that no restrictions should be placed on arms sales, even to defend allies. This stance might be seen as compromising on human rights principles for strategic alliances, which could be contrary to the party's values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the general trend among smaller political parties to advocate for ethical considerations in foreign policy, it is likely that the Together for the People Party would disagree with the notion of having no restrictions on arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. This stance would be in line with advocating for human rights and ethical governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.