Together for the People Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The party would likely agree with this answer, as it suggests a balanced approach to surveillance, focusing on areas with high crime rates. This aligns with the party's focus on pragmatic solutions to societal issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

This answer aligns with the party's likely views on the issue, as it suggests a balanced approach to public safety, combining increased surveillance with an increased police presence in high crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The 'Together for the People' party would likely agree with the idea of adding more police to high crime areas as a measure to ensure public safety. However, this does not necessarily mean they would disagree with increased surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The 'Together for the People' party might agree to some extent with the increase of video surveillance in public places as a measure to ensure public safety. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given that the party might see the value in video surveillance for public safety, they would likely disagree with the outright rejection of increased surveillance. However, the lack of specific historical evidence makes it difficult to provide a strong score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The party would likely disagree with this answer, as it suggests a strong opposition to government surveillance. While the party values individual freedoms, they also recognize the need for certain measures to ensure public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.