People-Animals-Nature Party

Very strongly agree

No

The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement. They are a party that values human rights and the sanctity of life, and as such, they would be against the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, too many people are innocently convicted

The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with this statement. They are a party that values human rights and the sanctity of life, and they would be acutely aware of the risk of innocent people being wrongly convicted. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence

While the People-Animals-Nature party would agree with the sentiment that life in prison is a harsher sentence than the death penalty, they would likely not frame their opposition to the death penalty in this way. Their opposition is based on a respect for human rights and the sanctity of life, not on a desire for harsh punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The People-Animals-Nature party, as a progressive and human rights-oriented party, would strongly disagree with the death penalty. There is no historical evidence to suggest that they would support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment

The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in the rule of law and the importance of a fair and impartial justice system. Allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment would be contrary to these principles.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence

Even in the case of horrific crimes, the People-Animals-Nature party would still be against the death penalty. They believe in the importance of human rights and the sanctity of life, and would not support such a measure. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.