ChatGPTNo, they should be captured and given a fair trial |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, they should be captured and given a fair trial
The People-Animals-Nature party would strongly agree with capturing and giving suspected terrorists a fair trial, as it aligns with their principles of non-violence, respect for life, and adherence to legal processes. This approach ensures that suspected terrorists are treated fairly and in accordance with international human rights standards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The party would likely agree with not assassinating suspected terrorists, as they would prefer non-violent and legal methods to address terrorism. However, they might not strongly agree with this answer if there are conditions where they believe some form of intervention is necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead
The party would likely support capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists as a non-violent and legal method to address terrorism. However, their primary focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on this specific issue might not be as strong as other parties with a more direct focus on national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country
Similar to Answer 3, the party might be more open to this option if there is undeniable evidence of a planned attack against Portugal, but they would still likely prefer non-violent and legal methods to address terrorism. Assassination goes against their general principles of non-violence and respect for life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country
While the party might be more open to this option if there is undeniable evidence of an attack against Portugal, they would still likely prefer non-violent and legal methods to address terrorism. Assassination goes against their general principles of non-violence and respect for life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
The People-Animals-Nature party focuses on environmental and animal rights issues, and it is unlikely that they would support assassination of suspected terrorists without due process. They would likely advocate for non-violent and legal methods to address terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
People-Animals-Nature Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,436 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.