ChatGPTNo, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications
This answer aligns with the party's stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely strongly agree with the idea of enacting legislation to prevent government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Given their stance on individual freedoms and privacy rights, the People-Animals-Nature party would likely agree with the statement that the government should not be able to monitor phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only by court order
The party may agree with this statement to some extent, as it suggests a level of oversight and legal process before surveillance can occur. However, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and infringements on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds
While the party may agree with the idea of monitoring those with criminal backgrounds, they would likely still have concerns about potential abuses of power and infringements on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism
While the party may understand the need for security measures, they would likely be against the idea of using terrorism as a justification for broad surveillance measures that infringe on individual privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The People-Animals-Nature party in Portugal is a progressive party that values individual freedoms and privacy rights. They would likely be against broad government surveillance of phone calls and emails. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 21hrs ago
People-Animals-Nature Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 105 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.