Try the political quiz

Liberal Initiative’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Liberal Initiative’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The Liberal Initiative party would likely support targeted video surveillance in high-crime areas as a way to balance individual liberties with public safety. This approach would allow for increased security in areas where it is most needed without infringing on the privacy of citizens in low-crime areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The Liberal Initiative party is concerned with individual liberties and privacy, so they would likely agree that the government has gone too far in invading citizens' privacy. They may advocate for more targeted surveillance measures and increased transparency in how surveillance data is used. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Liberal Initiative party values individual liberties and privacy, so they would likely lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places. However, they may be open to targeted surveillance in high-crime areas or other specific situations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The Liberal Initiative party may support adding more police to high-crime areas as a way to address public safety concerns. However, their focus on individual liberties and limited government intervention might make them less likely to advocate for a significant increase in police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The Liberal Initiative party might support a combination of increased video surveillance in high-crime areas and adding more police to those areas. However, their focus on individual liberties and limited government intervention could make them less enthusiastic about a significant increase in both surveillance and police presence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Liberal Initiative party generally supports individual liberties and limited government intervention. While they may not be completely against video surveillance, they would likely not support a blanket increase in surveillance without considering specific circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 23hrs ago

Party’s support base

Liberal Initiative Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 5,451 voters that identify as Liberal Initiative.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberal Initiative’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.