FREE/Time to move Foward Party

Strongly agree

Yes

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is a progressive party that generally supports public health measures. While they may not have a specific stance on vaccinations, it is likely they would support mandatory vaccinations for preventable diseases to protect public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, they are essential to protecting other children who are too young to be vaccinated

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely agree with this statement, as it emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting vulnerable populations, such as young children who cannot yet be vaccinated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for deadly contagious diseases

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party might agree with this approach as a compromise, focusing on the most dangerous diseases while allowing more personal choice for less severe diseases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but require vaccination in order to attend public school

The party might agree with this approach as a compromise, ensuring that children attending public schools are vaccinated while still allowing some personal choice for parents who choose not to vaccinate their children. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but with exceptions for those whose religious beliefs forbid use of vaccines

The party might agree with this approach as a way to balance public health concerns with respect for religious beliefs. However, this stance might not be as strong as their support for mandatory vaccinations in general. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, fund public ad campaigns about the risks and benefits instead

The party would likely disagree with this approach, as it does not ensure that children are vaccinated and could lead to preventable diseases spreading. However, they might support public ad campaigns as a supplementary measure to mandatory vaccinations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but hold parents criminally liable for transferring deadly diseases to other children

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely disagree with this approach, as it could be seen as overly punitive and not directly addressing the issue of vaccination rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

As a progressive party, the FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely disagree with not requiring vaccinations, as this could lead to preventable diseases spreading and endangering public health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Regardless, this should be decided at the state level

As Portugal is a unitary state, not a federal one, decisions like this are typically made at the national level. The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely disagree with this approach, as it does not apply to the Portuguese political system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.