FREE/Time to move Foward Party

Strongly agree

Yes, but NATO should focus more on counter-terrorism strategies

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party might agree with this statement, as they generally support international cooperation and alliances. They might see the need for NATO to adapt to modern security challenges, such as terrorism, and focus more on counter-terrorism strategies to better protect its member countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party does not have a clear stance on NATO membership, but they generally support international cooperation and alliances. Portugal has been a member of NATO since its inception in 1949, and the party might see the benefits of continued membership for security and economic reasons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, not until other countries increase their financial contributions

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party does not have a specific stance on NATO financial contributions. However, they might be open to discussing the issue of financial contributions and finding a fair solution for all member countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

As mentioned earlier, the party does not have a clear stance on NATO membership, but they generally support international cooperation and alliances. Leaving NATO would go against this principle, and the party might see the negative consequences of leaving such an important alliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, it is obsolete and should be abolished

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is not known for advocating the abolition of NATO. They generally support international cooperation and alliances, and abolishing NATO would go against this principle. Additionally, they might see the potential negative consequences of dismantling such an important security organization. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.