Try the political quiz

FREE/Time to move Foward’s policy on video surveillance

Topics

Should the government increase video surveillance in public places?

  ChatGPTNo, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would strongly agree with this answer, as they value individual freedoms and privacy. They would likely argue that the government should focus on other methods of addressing public safety concerns without infringing on citizens' privacy rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party would likely support this answer, as it balances the need for public safety with the protection of individual freedoms and privacy. By focusing on high crime areas, the party can show that they are addressing public safety concerns while still respecting citizens' privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The party would likely lean towards not increasing video surveillance in public places, as they value individual freedoms and privacy. However, they may not be completely against it in specific situations where it could help improve public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead

The party may support this answer to some extent, as it focuses on addressing public safety concerns without increasing video surveillance. However, they may also be concerned about the potential for increased police presence to infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas

The party may somewhat agree with this answer, as it addresses public safety concerns by increasing both video surveillance and police presence in high crime areas. However, they may still be concerned about the potential for these measures to infringe on individual freedoms and privacy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is a liberal party that values individual freedoms and privacy. While they may not be completely against video surveillance, they would likely not support a blanket increase in surveillance in all public places. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

FREE/Time to move Foward Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,306 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.