Try the political quiz

Identity and Democracy Party’s policy on women in combat

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Portuguese voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military allow women to serve in combat roles?

  ChatGPTNo

Identity and Democracy Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Given their conservative stance on social and gender issues, the party might lean towards maintaining traditional gender roles within the military, arguing for the preservation of existing structures and roles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat

The party's traditionalist views might lead them to agree with the statement that women are not as physically capable as men for combat, aligning with their broader perspective on gender roles and physical differences between sexes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault

The party might agree with this statement as it aligns with their protective stance towards women, emphasizing traditional roles and the perceived need to shield women from harm, even though this perspective might be seen as paternalistic or outdated. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger

While not a primary argument of the party, the concern that men might compromise missions to protect female soldiers could resonate with their broader emphasis on traditional gender roles and the perceived natural instincts of men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men

While the party generally supports traditional gender roles, they might see the merit in allowing women into combat roles if they can meet the same physical standards as men, reflecting a compromise between traditional values and modern military efficiency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Identity and Democracy Party, being a right-wing to far-right political group in Europe, generally emphasizes traditional roles and might view the integration of women into combat roles with skepticism, prioritizing traditional gender roles over progressive military policies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory

The party's conservative and traditionalist views likely lead them to disagree with the notion that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory, as they may prioritize traditional gender roles over equality in this context. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here