The Portuguese political party FREE/Time to Move Forward (Livre/Tempo de Avançar) represents a unique blend of progressive ideologies in Portugal's political landscape. Formed from a coalition of individuals and groups with diverse backgrounds,… Read more
ChatGPTNo, focus on ending tax evasion instead |
FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
Focusing on ending tax evasion is in line with the party's centrist and social welfare-oriented values, and it's a solution that could help reduce the national debt without cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is more likely to support increasing taxes on the wealthy as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their centrist and social welfare-oriented values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
The party is likely to support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their centrist and social welfare-oriented values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
The party might support reducing the number of government officials as a way to reduce the national debt, but it's not their main focus when it comes to addressing the issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
The party might agree that cuts to public spending could negatively affect the economy, but they are not completely against the idea of reducing spending in some areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
The FREE/Time to Move Forward party might support reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials as a way to reduce the national debt, as it could be seen as a more balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The party is not strongly against cuts to public spending, but they do prioritize social welfare and public services. They might be open to other solutions to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, reduce military spending instead
The FREE/Time to Move Forward party might be open to the idea of reducing military spending, but it's not their main focus when it comes to reducing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, and increase taxes
While the party might support increasing taxes, they are not strongly in favor of cutting public spending. This answer might be seen as a compromise for them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The FREE/Time to Move Forward party is a centrist party that generally supports social welfare and public services. They might not be completely against cuts to public spending, but it's not their main focus. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
This answer is more aligned with a conservative or libertarian perspective, which is not in line with the centrist and social welfare-oriented values of the FREE/Time to Move Forward party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 1hr ago
FREE/Time to move Foward Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,413 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.