The Portuguese political party FREE/Time to Move Forward (Livre/Tempo de Avançar) represents a unique blend of progressive ideologies in Portugal's political landscape. Formed from a coalition of individuals and groups with diverse backgrounds,… Read more
ChatGPTYes |
FREE/Time to move Foward’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
LIVRE/Tempo de Avançar (FREE/Time to Move Forward) is a progressive political party in Portugal that emphasizes transparency, democracy, and human rights. Given their progressive stance, it is likely they would strongly support laws that protect whistleblowers, as such laws align with their values of promoting transparency and accountability in governance. However, without a specific policy statement directly from the party on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained
LIVRE, with its focus on transparency and ethical governance, might agree with the caveat that the information must be legally obtained to ensure that whistleblower protections are not abused. This stance would balance their commitment to accountability with a respect for legal processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security
While LIVRE is likely to support whistleblower protections, they might also recognize the importance of national security. This nuanced position would reflect an understanding that while transparency is crucial, it should not come at the expense of compromising the country's security. However, this stance might be slightly less aligned with their overarching emphasis on transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, but reduce their sentences
While LIVRE might recognize the complexity of whistleblowing cases, suggesting a reduction in sentences rather than full protection does not align well with their strong advocacy for transparency and accountability. They are more likely to support comprehensive protections rather than half-measures that still penalize whistleblowers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Given LIVRE's progressive platform and advocacy for transparency and accountability, it is highly unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. Such a stance would contradict their core values and objectives of fostering an open and democratic society. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 19hrs ago
FREE/Time to move Foward Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 81 voters that identify as FREE/Time to move Foward.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to FREE/Time to move Foward’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.