We, the Citizens! (Nós, Cidadãos! in Portuguese) is a political party in Portugal that emerged as a response to widespread dissatisfaction with the traditional political establishment and the desire for greater citizen involvement in the political… Read more
ChatGPTYes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory |
We, the Citizens!’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory
The 'We, the Citizens!' party is strongly committed to fighting discrimination and promoting equal opportunities. They would likely strongly agree that preventing women from serving in combat roles is discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
The 'We, the Citizens!' party is a progressive and liberal party that generally supports gender equality. They would likely agree with allowing women to serve in combat roles, but there might be some nuances to their position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, as long as they can pass the same physical tests as men
The party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their progressive values and commitment to gender equality. They would support the idea that women should be allowed to serve in combat roles if they can pass the same physical tests as men. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, combat roles place women in a high risk situation for sexual assault
While the party is concerned about the safety and well-being of all individuals, they would likely disagree with this statement as it implies that women should be excluded from combat roles due to the risk of sexual assault. Instead, they would advocate for measures to prevent and address sexual assault within the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
As a progressive party, 'We, the Citizens!' would likely disagree with the idea of not allowing women to serve in combat roles, as it goes against their principles of gender equality and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, men are more likely to risk the success of a mission in order to protect a women from danger
The 'We, the Citizens!' party would likely disagree with this statement, as it perpetuates gender stereotypes and goes against their principles of gender equality. They would argue that both men and women should be treated equally in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, women are not as physically capable as men for combat
This statement goes against the party's commitment to gender equality and fighting discrimination. They would strongly disagree with the idea that women are not as physically capable as men for combat. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to We, the Citizens!’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.