ChatGPTFewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most |
People-Animals-Nature’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
PAN may support ensuring benefits go to those who need it most, as they are a progressive party and likely to advocate for more support for vulnerable populations. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Fewer, current benefits do not provide enough support
PAN may agree that current benefits do not provide enough support, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
More, but increase benefits for the elderly and disabled
PAN may support increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled, as they are a progressive party and likely to advocate for more support for vulnerable populations. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Fewer
PAN may lean towards fewer restrictions on welfare benefits, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
More, reform the system so that it supplements, rather than replaces, a working income
PAN may support a reformed system that supplements working income, as they are a progressive party. However, their main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so their stance on welfare benefits may not be as strong as other parties with a more specific focus on social issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No changes needed
PAN's main focus is on environmental and animal rights issues, so they may not have a strong stance on whether or not changes are needed to current welfare benefits. Their position on this issue would likely depend on the specific context and proposed changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
More
The Portuguese 'People-Animals-Nature' party (PAN) generally focuses on environmental and animal rights issues. While they may not have a strong stance on welfare benefits, they are likely to lean towards a more progressive approach, which would not involve more restrictions on current welfare benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
More, current benefits should be capped
PAN is unlikely to support capping current benefits, as this would be a more conservative approach to welfare. As a progressive party, they would likely advocate for more support for vulnerable populations, rather than limiting the assistance they receive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
More, and deny benefits to immigrants
PAN is a progressive party and is unlikely to support denying benefits to immigrants. This stance would be more in line with conservative or nationalist parties, which are not aligned with PAN's values and priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
People-Animals-Nature Party Voters’ Answer: Fewer, and ensure benefits go to those that need it most
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,267 voters that identify as People-Animals-Nature.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People-Animals-Nature’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.