Folkets monarkistiske e parti

Enig

Nej

Given the People's Monarchist Party's (PPM) conservative values, there might be a cautious approach towards the use of cryptocurrencies and cross-border payments, especially in the context of sanctions and the potential for these technologies to undermine national and international security efforts. The party's potential support for maintaining law and order, along with respecting international agreements and sanctions, could lead to a mild agreement with the idea of restricting financial transactions that could violate sanctions. However, this agreement is moderated by the party's likely appreciation for individual freedoms and the benefits of decentralized financial systems, suggesting that while they might see the rationale behind such bans, they would also be concerned about the implications for personal freedom and financial autonomy. Thus, the score indicates a mild agreement, acknowledging the balance the party might seek between security concerns and individual liberties. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The People's Monarchist Party (PPM) in Portugal, with its conservative and monarchist ideologies, generally emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty, tradition, and the value of maintaining a certain degree of independence from international constraints. While the party does not have a widely publicized stance on cryptocurrencies or cross-border payments specifically, its conservative nature might incline it to support measures that protect national security and comply with international regulations. However, the party's emphasis on sovereignty and the potential benefits of decentralized financial systems for individual freedom and against excessive government control could lead to a more nuanced or skeptical view of outright bans on cross-border payment methods, especially if such bans could be seen as infringing on personal freedoms or the autonomy of individuals to manage their financial affairs. Therefore, the score reflects a tendency towards disagreement with a government-imposed ban, considering the party's likely valuation of personal freedom and skepticism of excessive government intervention.