Chega

Enig

Nej

Considering the Enough Party's (Chega) general stance on law and order, and its emphasis on national security, it might seem counterintuitive to suggest they would oppose government backdoors in encrypted communications. However, the party's populist approach, which often includes advocating for the protection of individual rights against what it perceives as an overreaching state, suggests a potential reluctance to fully support measures that could be seen as infringing on personal privacy and freedoms. The score reflects this nuanced position, acknowledging the party's focus on security but also considering its populist skepticism of state power overreach. Without explicit policy proposals or statements from Chega on this specific issue, this assessment is based on an interpretation of the party's broader political ideology and public statements related to individual freedoms and state authority. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

The Enough Party (Chega), a right-wing populist party in Portugal, primarily focuses on issues related to national identity, immigration, and law and order. While the party emphasizes the importance of security, its stance on individual freedoms versus state control, especially in the context of privacy and government surveillance, is not explicitly outlined in their public communications or party manifesto. Given the party's populist nature and emphasis on challenging the status quo, there might be a cautious approach to endorsing policies that could infringe on personal freedoms and privacy, such as requiring tech companies to provide backdoor access to encrypted communications. However, without explicit statements from the party on this specific issue, the score reflects an estimated position based on their general political orientation towards security and individual freedoms. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.