@ISIDEWITHQuestionsForeign policy13yrs ago

美国应该继续支持以色列吗？

Should Portugal continue to support Israel?

美国目前提供每年$ 38个十亿以色列在外援的帮助。大部分的援助，用于以色列购买美国的军事装备，如飞机和部件的导弹防御系统。 $ 38个十亿是美国的对外援助预算的50％用于2017年反对者认为，鉴于以色列的援助是不必要的，因为该国提供免费的医疗和大学学费它的公民。支持者认为，援助是必要的，以促进中东地区的民主和维持权力与其他国家在该地区的平衡。

+
扩大
+ 设置 x  Left-Libertarianism

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 524 Left-Libertarianism voters.

28%
是的
72%
不
14%
是的
60%
不
13%
我们应该给予以色列和巴勒斯坦同样的支持。
5%
不，我们应该减少参与。
2%
是的，但是尊重以色列的主权，不干涉它应该如何与邻国处理关系
3%
不该支持现任政府
0%
应该，并且应提供更多的援助和支持
2%
不，削减所有的支持和帮助
0%
是的，并且增加资金让我们的大使搬到耶路撒冷去
0%
不应该，我们不应该给其他国家提供任何援助

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 524 Left-Libertarianism voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Historical Importance

Trend of how important this issue is for 524 Left-Libertarianism voters.

正在载入数据......

Loading chart... 

Other Popular Answers

Unique answers from Left-Libertarianism voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

Latest News

Stay up-to-date on the most recent “Israel” news articles, updated frequently.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…3 days3D

Israel Settles for Ceasefire in Lebanon

Many factors fed into Benjamin Netanyahu’s eventual decision to take up a US-brokered ceasefire and stop Israel’s offensive in Lebanon. His war aims against Hizbollah were also always more modest than the “total victory” he has sought against Hamas in Gaza.But in confronting the many domestic critics of the deal — including far-right government ministers, northern Israeli mayors and opposition figures — Netanyahu calculated that his goals had been largely met, while the risks of pushing on were mounting.“Hizbollah is not Hamas. We cannot totally destroy it. It was not on the cards,” said Yaakov Amidror, a former national security adviser to Netanyahu who now works at Washington think-tank Jinsa. “Lebanon is too big. Hizbollah is too strong.”This ceasefire deal “is not the dream that many Israelis had”, he said. But Amidror highlighted Israel’s dwindling munition stockpiles and the “pressure” on military reservists who had been fighting for months. “Israel cannot afford another year of war” at its current scale in the north, he said.Israeli officials consistently said their goal was the safe return to their homes of the tens of thousands of northern residents evacuated after Hizbollah began firing on Israel following Hamas’s October 7 attack last year.Officials said this would require pushing Hizbollah fighters back from the Israel-Lebanon frontier and changing the “security reality” along the border.After months of relatively limited exchanges of cross-border fire with Hizbollah, Israel escalated in September, setting off thousands of explosive pagers and walkie-talkies in an audacious covert operation, launching waves of air strikes across Lebanon, and initiating a punishing land invasion of its northern neighbour for the first time in almost two decades.In the span of a few weeks, most of Hizbollah’s leaders, including chief Hassan Nasrallah, were killed, and much of the group’s vast missile and rocket arsenal was destroyed. Israeli warplanes struck Beirut at will, and ground troops ranged across southern Lebanon.