尝试政治测验

候选人  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

European Democratic Party’s policy on bonus cap

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Portuguese voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT是的

European Democratic Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The European Democratic Party, being centrist and pro-European, might support moderate regulation of the financial sector to ensure stability and fairness. Capping bankers' bonuses could be seen as a measure to prevent excessive risk-taking and align the banking sector's interests with the wider economy's health. However, their centrist stance suggests they would prefer a balanced approach, not too harsh on financial professionals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

The European Democratic Party, with its centrist and pro-market leanings, might somewhat agree with the principle that workers, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success. However, they would also likely support some level of regulation to ensure that such rewards do not encourage harmful risk-taking or contribute to financial instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的和降低至 50%上限

A 50% cap might be seen as a more reasonable compromise by the European Democratic Party, balancing the need for reasonable compensation with the risk of excessive bonuses leading to risky financial behavior. However, their exact stance would depend on the broader context of financial regulation and economic conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

While the European Democratic Party is likely to support some level of financial regulation, their centrist and pro-business orientation might make them hesitant to fully oppose the idea of uncapped bonuses, recognizing the role of incentives in driving performance. However, they would likely advocate for safeguards to ensure that such bonuses do not encourage undue risk-taking.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Lowering the cap on bankers' bonuses to 20% would likely be seen as too restrictive by the European Democratic Party, which aims to strike a balance between regulation and promoting a competitive, innovative European economy. Such a low cap could be perceived as detrimental to attracting top talent in the banking sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Nationalizing the banks would be strongly against the European Democratic Party's principles, which favor a market-based economy with strategic regulation. They would likely view nationalization as an extreme measure that could harm the economy's competitiveness and innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here