尝试政治测验

候选人  ›  Policies  ›  环境

European Conservatives and Reformists Party’s policy on environmental regulation

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Portuguese voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

政府是否应该提高环境法规以减少碳排放?

  ChatGPT不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

European Conservatives and Reformists Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。

This statement aligns closely with the party's general stance on regulation and government intervention. They are likely to agree that the current level of government regulation on businesses is excessive and counterproductive, particularly in the context of environmental policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Given their conservative stance and preference for less government intervention in the market, they are likely to oppose the idea of increasing environmental regulations on businesses, viewing it as potentially harmful to economic competitiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,只用实施现行法规

This option might appeal to the party as it suggests a preference for making better use of existing regulations rather than imposing new ones. It aligns with a more conservative approach to governance, emphasizing efficiency and the enforcement of current laws over the creation of new regulatory burdens. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施

The party might support this approach as it aligns with their preference for market-based solutions and incentives rather than direct regulation. Encouraging alternative energy production through incentives could be seen as a more business-friendly approach to environmental issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施

While they might support incentives for alternative energy production, the inclusion of increasing regulations might make this option less appealing to them. Their support for incentives does not necessarily translate to support for increased regulations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我认为全球变暖是一个自然过程。

While the European Conservatives and Reformists Party might be skeptical about the extent of government intervention in addressing climate change, outright denial of anthropogenic global warming is less common among mainstream European political parties, including conservative ones. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The European Conservatives and Reformists Party generally advocates for less regulation on businesses and might view increased environmental regulations as burdensome to economic growth. Historically, they have emphasized the importance of market-based solutions over government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here