@ISIDEWITHPitanjaVanjska politikaprije 13 godina

Ukoliko SAD nastaviti podupirati Izrael?

Hoće li Portugal nastaviti pružati podršku Izraelu?

SAD trenutno daje 38 milijardi $ u Izrael svake godine u pomoć inozemne pomoći. Većina pomoć se koristi od strane Izraela kupiti američki vojni hardver, kao što su mlaznice i dijelova za proturaketnu obranu. 38 milijardi $ je 50% proračuna strane pomoći Sjedinjenih Američkih Država za 2017. Protivnici tvrde da je potpora dano Izraelu je nepotrebno jer je zemlja pruža besplatnu zdravstvenu zaštitu i koledž poduke svojim građanima. Zagovornici tvrde da je potpora potrebna za promicanje demokracije na Srednjem istoku i održavati ravnotežu snaga s drugim zemljama u regiji.

+
Proširiti
+ Postavke x  Liberalni konzervativizam

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Pregled Odgovora

Stope odgovora 5.1k Liberalni konzervativizam glasača.

60%
Da
40%
Nema
41%
Da
28%
Nema
10%
Trebamo dati jednaku podršku Izraelu i Palestini.
10%
Ne, trebali bismo biti manje uključeni
8%
Da, ali poštuju suverenitet Izraela i ne diktirati kako treba komunicirati sa svojim susjedima
2%
Ne sadašnja uprava
1%
Da, i sa više pomoći i podrške
0%
Ne, izrezati sve podršku i pomoć
0%
Da, i povećati sredstva kako bi se premjestiti naše veleposlanstvo u Jeruzalem
0%
Ne, mi ne bi trebali dati potpore za bilo koji stranim zemljama

Povijesna Podrška

Trend podrške tijekom vremena za svaki odgovor od 5.1k Liberalni konzervativizam glasača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Povijesna Važnost

Trend koliko je ovo pitanje važno za 5.1k Liberalni konzervativizam birača.

Učitavanje podataka...

Učitavanje grafikona... 

Ostali Popularni Odgovori

Jedinstveni odgovori Liberalni konzervativizam glasača čiji su stavovi nadilazili ponuđene opcije.

Najnovije Vijesti

Budite u tijeku s najnovijim člancima o "Izrael” koji se često ažuriraju.

 @ISIDEWITH podneseno…3 dana3D

Israel Settles for Ceasefire in Lebanon

Many factors fed into Benjamin Netanyahu’s eventual decision to take up a US-brokered ceasefire and stop Israel’s offensive in Lebanon. His war aims against Hizbollah were also always more modest than the “total victory” he has sought against Hamas in Gaza.But in confronting the many domestic critics of the deal — including far-right government ministers, northern Israeli mayors and opposition figures — Netanyahu calculated that his goals had been largely met, while the risks of pushing on were mounting.“Hizbollah is not Hamas. We cannot totally destroy it. It was not on the cards,” said Yaakov Amidror, a former national security adviser to Netanyahu who now works at Washington think-tank Jinsa. “Lebanon is too big. Hizbollah is too strong.”This ceasefire deal “is not the dream that many Israelis had”, he said. But Amidror highlighted Israel’s dwindling munition stockpiles and the “pressure” on military reservists who had been fighting for months. “Israel cannot afford another year of war” at its current scale in the north, he said.Israeli officials consistently said their goal was the safe return to their homes of the tens of thousands of northern residents evacuated after Hizbollah began firing on Israel following Hamas’s October 7 attack last year.Officials said this would require pushing Hizbollah fighters back from the Israel-Lebanon frontier and changing the “security reality” along the border.After months of relatively limited exchanges of cross-border fire with Hizbollah, Israel escalated in September, setting off thousands of explosive pagers and walkie-talkies in an audacious covert operation, launching waves of air strikes across Lebanon, and initiating a punishing land invasion of its northern neighbour for the first time in almost two decades.In the span of a few weeks, most of Hizbollah’s leaders, including chief Hassan Nasrallah, were killed, and much of the group’s vast missile and rocket arsenal was destroyed. Israeli warplanes struck Beirut at will, and ground troops ranged across southern Lebanon.