54% Yes |
46% No |
32% Yes |
43% No |
12% Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
3% No, not until we decrease our national debt |
9% Yes, but only for low-income pensioners |
1% No, they should be reduced |
2% Yes, for government workers but not for politicians |
See how support for each position on “Government Pensions” has changed over time for 5k Portugal voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
See how importance of “Government Pensions” has changed over time for 5k Portugal voters.
Loading data...
Loading chart...
Unique answers from Portugal users whose views extended beyond the provided choices.
Explore other topics that are important to Portugal voters.
@ISIDEWITH3mos3MO
The United Nations defines human rights violations as deprivation of life; torture, cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; slavery and forced labor; arbitrary arrest or detention; arbitrary interference with privacy; war propaganda; discrimination; and advocacy of racial or religious hatred. In…
@ISIDEWITH1yr1Y
Countries that have mandatory retirements for politicians include Argentina (age 75), Brazil (75 for judges and prosecutors), Mexico (70 for judges and prosecutors) and Singapore (75 for members of parliament.)