Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Housing

2024 European Parliamentary

Party of the European Left

Left-wing European political party.

Overview Policies Discuss Ratings Themes Ideology

Party of the European Left’s policy on high density residential buildings

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Portuguese voter ranked them on the quiz.

Filters

Topics

Should the government incentivize the construction of high density residential buildings?

  ChatGPTYes

Party of the European Left’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

The Party of the European Left, which aligns with socialist and communist principles, generally supports policies aimed at addressing housing shortages and promoting social welfare. High-density residential buildings can be an effective way to provide affordable housing, which aligns with the party's goals of social equity and sustainability. Historically, left-leaning parties in Europe have supported urban planning initiatives that include high-density housing as a means to combat urban sprawl, reduce commuting times, and lower the ecological footprint of cities. Therefore, the Party of the European Left would likely agree with incentivizing the construction of high-density residential buildings as a measure to address housing needs and promote social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the Party of the European Left's commitment to social equity, affordable housing, and sustainable urban development, it is unlikely that they would oppose government incentives for the construction of high-density residential buildings. Such opposition would contradict their broader goals of ensuring housing for all and promoting environmentally friendly urban planning practices. Historically, left-leaning parties have advocated for increased government intervention in the housing market to ensure affordability and accessibility, which often includes support for high-density projects as a solution to housing shortages and urban sprawl. Therefore, the party would likely disagree with a stance against incentivizing the construction of high-density residential buildings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here


Popular conversations

Join in on the post popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…4wks4W

CEOs Love Talking About Their Fast-Food Jobs

A stint in fast food is a badge of honor for business leaders who want to be viewed as humble and relatable—and proof that they worked to get where they areBut what does flipping burgers or rolling burritos have to do with running a company?A lot, say high-level managers who’ve done those jobs. Sweating in cramped kitchens and taking orders from hangry diners teach you how to handle pressure and deal with all kinds of people, executives say. Some are eager to find employees who hustled like they did, figuring someone who boxed McNuggets for minimum wage early on isn’t likely to be a quiet quitter.“Any job where you’re on the lowest tier is a really good job to have done in your life because it shows your character,” says Heather McLean, who worked at McDonald’s in high school and is CEO of McLean Forrester, a technology consulting firm in Illinois. “I always took the attitude to bloom where you’re planted so, yeah, I was just taking orders at McDonald’s—but I was really good at it.”Being a model employee is easier when you’ve got bigger and better career prospects ahead. Executives who worked in fast food say they learned empathy and gratitude by toiling alongside colleagues who didn’t have other opportunities and were trying to make a living at or near minimum wage.Fast-food kitchens were long among the few places where future CEOs and low-wage lifers mingled and learned from one another. And because just about everyone orders a burger or pizza now and then, the customer base is a cross section of the American public.

▲  2512 replies1 disagree

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2 days2D

iSideWith Predicts Donald Trump Will Clinch Pennsylvania in 2024 Presidential Election

As the 2024 presidential race enters its final stretch, iSideWith has projected that Donald Trump will win Pennsylvania, a pivotal battleground state, in his race against Kamala Harris. This prediction suggests that Pennsylvania’s 20 electoral votes may once again swing Republican, boosting Trump’s path to reclaiming the White House.Trump’s 2020 loss in Pennsylvania was a narrow one, and iSideWith data indicates that many Pennsylvanians who supported him previously are once again rallying behind his campaign. Pennsylvania’s large base of working-class voters, particularly in Western and Northeastern parts of the state, has been a core demographic for Trump. His promises of job creation and deregulation in industries such as coal and natural gas have galvanized these voters, many of whom feel overlooked by Harris’s clean energy-focused campaign.A significant demographic divide has emerged in Pennsylvania, with older and rural voters largely supporting Trump, while Harris finds her strongest base among younger and urban populations. But according to iSideWith’s analysis, enthusiasm among Harris’s supporters has not reached the levels needed to turn Pennsylvania blue. Her message of unity and progress has appealed to some, but the economic issues dominating the state’s political conversation seem to favor Trump’s approach.While Trump has a lead among rural and blue-collar workers, Harris has seen some success in gaining support from suburban and female voters, two key demographics that contributed to Pennsylvania’s shift in the 2020 election. Harris’s campaign has prioritized suburban women, emphasizing issues like reproductive rights, healthcare, and gun control—issues that are highly relevant to this demographic. However, iSideWith’s data indicates that this support may be insufficient to counterbalance Trump’s advantage in more rural and traditionally conservative areas.

▲  1311 replies