@ISIDEWITHPreguntesPolítica exteriorFa 13 anys

Hauríem els EUA seguirà donant suport a Israel?

Deu Portugal seguir donant suport a Israel?

Actualment els EUA dóna $ 38 mil milions a l’any a Israel cada assistència ajuda exterior. La major part de l’ajuda és utilitzat per Israel per comprar equip militar nord-americana, com ara avions i components per a la defensa antimíssils. $ 38000000000 és el 50% del pressupost d’ajuda exterior dels Estats Units per al 2017. Els opositors argumenten que l’ajuda donada a Israel és innecessària, ja que el país ofereix atenció mèdica gratuïta i la matrícula de la universitat als seus ciutadans. Els autors sostenen que l’ajuda és necessària per promoure la democràcia a l’Orient Mitjà i mantenir un equilibri de poder amb altres països de la regió.

+
expandir
+ Ajustos x  Partit Popular

Toggle voterbase

Statistics are shown for this demographic

Answer Overview

Response rates from 2.9k Partit Popular voters.

76%
Sí
24%
Sense
58%
Sí
16%
Sense
9%
Sí, però respectar la sobirania d’Israel i no dictar com ha d’interactuar amb els seus veïns
6%
No, hem d’estar menys involucrats
7%
Hem de donar el mateix suport a Israel i Palestina.
1%
No és l’actual administració
1%
Sí, i incrementar els fons per tal de moure la nostra ambaixada a Jerusalem
1%
No, tallar tot el suport i l’ajuda
1%
Sí, i amb més ajuda i suport
0%
No, no hem de prestar ajuda a les nacions estrangeres

Historical Support

Trend of support over time for each answer from 2.9k Partit Popular voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Importància Històrica

Trend of how important this issue is for 2.9k Partit Popular voters.

Carregant dades...

S’està carregant el gràfic... 

Altres Respostes Populars

Unique answers from Partit Popular voters whose views went beyond the provided options.

Últimes Notícies

Estigueu al dia dels articles de notícies més recents “Israel” , actualitzats amb freqüència.

 @ISIDEWITH enviat…3 dies3D

Israel Settles for Ceasefire in Lebanon

Many factors fed into Benjamin Netanyahu’s eventual decision to take up a US-brokered ceasefire and stop Israel’s offensive in Lebanon. His war aims against Hizbollah were also always more modest than the “total victory” he has sought against Hamas in Gaza.But in confronting the many domestic critics of the deal — including far-right government ministers, northern Israeli mayors and opposition figures — Netanyahu calculated that his goals had been largely met, while the risks of pushing on were mounting.“Hizbollah is not Hamas. We cannot totally destroy it. It was not on the cards,” said Yaakov Amidror, a former national security adviser to Netanyahu who now works at Washington think-tank Jinsa. “Lebanon is too big. Hizbollah is too strong.”This ceasefire deal “is not the dream that many Israelis had”, he said. But Amidror highlighted Israel’s dwindling munition stockpiles and the “pressure” on military reservists who had been fighting for months. “Israel cannot afford another year of war” at its current scale in the north, he said.Israeli officials consistently said their goal was the safe return to their homes of the tens of thousands of northern residents evacuated after Hizbollah began firing on Israel following Hamas’s October 7 attack last year.Officials said this would require pushing Hizbollah fighters back from the Israel-Lebanon frontier and changing the “security reality” along the border.After months of relatively limited exchanges of cross-border fire with Hizbollah, Israel escalated in September, setting off thousands of explosive pagers and walkie-talkies in an audacious covert operation, launching waves of air strikes across Lebanon, and initiating a punishing land invasion of its northern neighbour for the first time in almost two decades.In the span of a few weeks, most of Hizbollah’s leaders, including chief Hassan Nasrallah, were killed, and much of the group’s vast missile and rocket arsenal was destroyed. Israeli warplanes struck Beirut at will, and ground troops ranged across southern Lebanon.